Pot committed fallacy tv#
Find the exact moment in a TV show, movie, or music video you want to share. If not Hitler, then perhaps Lenin, Stalin, Mao, or Pol Pot. Yarn is the best search for video clips by quote. These 'Allahdictated revelations' were supposedly committed to memory by Mohammad and later. 6 Conjunction fallacy the assumption that an outcome simultaneously satisfying multiple conditions is more probable than an outcome satisfying a single one of them. Mollys Game clip with quote Because he embraced the fallacy of being pot committed. As far as I know, this fallacy has never been explicitly mentioned before, and the fallacy of ‘dual moral code’ neither. Base rate fallacy making a probability judgment based on conditional probabilities, without taking into account the effect of prior probabilities.
But, of course, it is not the fallacy of wrong analogy, but obviously its counterpart: the fallacy of ignoring valid analogy. However, I somehow recognize this ‘dual moral code’ or ‘doublethink’ as a case of analogy, since two persons (or in an extended sense things associated with these persons), that are validly analogous in some respect, are compared. By ignoring the base rate of all voters, or the overall popularity of candidate X, youve committed the base rate fallacy. In the comments to the question, Conifold said that this is not a fallacy, as also hypocrisy isn’t one. A second suitable synonymous name is ‘double think’: someone thinks something for one context and then he thinks the opposite in a second equivalent context. The worst thing is that they use the term pot committed as an excuse to justify their play, and they fail realise just how abysmal their actions are. Instead, they just casually assume they are too heavily invested to consider folding. They don’t use any maths to calculate whether or not they are making a profitable long-term call.
In fact, only future costs should matter. The pot committed fallacy The problem many players make is taking pot commitment concept and misapplying it. People often say they are pot committed to fix something old, like a car, because they have high sunk costs that would go to waste if they threw in the towel and bought a newer car. If someone gets rightly the attribute “pot that calls the kettle black”, he has obviously a kind of ‘dual moral code’ since he reproaches the other person an attribute that he tolerates for himself. An absolutely huge mistake that beginner players make is to throw good money after bad. One of the terms often used when people use sunk costs to justify irrational decisions is the poker term pot committed.
It could also be regarded as the fallacy of ‘dual moral code’ or of ‘doublethink’. ‘The pot that calls the kettle black’ is a special case of the fallacy of ‘ignoring valid analogy’.
0 kommentar(er)
